Weekly commitment-gap digest

Evidence-backed commitment integrity for software teams.

Every Monday, clear a short high-confidence list of commitments that slipped — each one linked to the typed ask, the ticket, and the PR. If it isn't short and mostly right, we don't send it.

Request a demo Explore the product with synthetic data →

Method: sources first, confidence gate second

Start with what's typed

Slack (public and invited channels only), your tracker (Jira, Linear, or Asana), and GitHub. That's the Tier-1 set — it qualifies every digest.

Expand spoken coverage when ready

Otter, Fathom, or Granola — three equal choices that feed one canonical meeting model. Same commitment checks regardless of notetaker.

High-confidence or held

Ambiguous matches are held, not guessed. Below-threshold findings appear only as a held count in the weekly receipt.

Every claim links to evidence

Every gap links to the typed ask, the ticket, and the PR — or we don't send it. Confidence is always shown as prose with the evidence, never a bare score.

No employee scoring. No DM reading. No private exec-only gap feed. Threadout is shared team memory of commitments — not a scoreboard.

What each source set can honestly catch

Coverage by gap category. Today we see what is typed; spoken coverage expands once notetaker connectors are live.
Category	Tracker + GitHub	+ Slack	+ Otter / Fathom / Granola
Buried	Full	Full	Full
Deprioritized	Full	Full	Full
Dropped	Blind	Written asks only	Full (spoken)
Drifted	Ticket vs delivery	+ Slack asks	Full

Where notetaker support stands today

Otter, Fathom, and Granola are equal first-class choices in the product — and we're honest about current capability:

Otter — connector exists; production ingest currently needs repair before we call it live.
Granola — export upload is the supported path today; a direct connector comes when the API is ready.
Fathom — not built yet; it lands on the same adapter interface.

FAQ

Is this surveillance?: No. Threadout reads public and invited channels only, never DMs, and never produces person-level scores. It links asks to tickets and PRs so the team sees what slipped — that's it.
What do I do with a finding?: Four actions: Land it (own the follow-up, optionally open a templated ticket after preview), Kill it (mark intentional, with a reason the engine learns from), Assign it, or Dispute it.
What happens on a quiet week?: You get the receipt: how many channels, tickets, and PRs we checked, and how many findings were held below confidence. A short list you can trust beats a long list you ignore.
Which notetaker should we use?: Whichever you already run — Otter, Fathom, or Granola. All three will normalize to one meeting model with the same quality bar. None can be connected yet: Otter's connector needs repair, Granola is export-upload only, and Fathom isn't built. Ask about notetaker timing when you request a demo.

Privacy, in one paragraph

Org-owned tokens, read-only scopes, public and invited channels only. Transcript ingestion requires team consent — not a leader-only checkbox. Quotes are kept as short as possible with speaker and date, and every claim links back to its source. All transcript text is treated as untrusted input: nothing a meeting says becomes an instruction to any system.

Request a demo

We're onboarding a small set of design partners. Tell us what keeps slipping and we'll show you the Monday pass on your stack.